Ambrotypes were one of the earliest photographic processes. Called by the British a ‘wet collodion positive on glass’, the ambrotype was developed by
Technically, it is fascinating process. Firstly, an underexposed collodion negative on glass is bleached of its whitish tone by the application of nitric acid or mercury bichloride. It is then backed with either black lacquer or black paper to present a positive image. Ambrotypes were often mounted in a cased frame with a hinged cover. Each ambrotype, just as with daguerreotypes is a one-off. A unique image from one exposure. As they were easier to tint, ambrotypes are often retouched with gold paint to highlight jewellery and add reddish tones for women’s lips and cheeks. By the late 1860s, ambrotypes were replaced with carte de visites and tintypes.
The inclusion of a framed painting within an ambrotype is uncommon, especially since it skews the seated position of the young man.
3 comments:
I noticed the painting as well. I don't think I've seen too many of those. The case looks like it's in good shape and I love William's bow tie. And wow, he looks much older in the photo than 19. Cool ambro.
is this work in the AAG's collection?
There is actually only one ambrotype currently held in the Gallery's collection and that is a contemporary example of the medium: Ben Cauchi's 2005 Self portrait (2006/21/1). Ben has recently been the Frances Hodgkins Fellow at the University of Otago and his brilliant work with archaic techniques such as the ambrotype have brought him much attention.
To study other ambrotypes in public collections please consult the Auckland Museum and the Museum of New Zealand. Regional museums may also have 19th century examples in their care.
It is interesting to note that ambrotypes have only been internationally exhibited in art galleries, as works of art, since the 1980s. Apart from the Ben Cauchi, none have ever been shown at Auckland Art Gallery. I understand that ambrotypes are either rarely, or never, encountered in New Zealand's art galleries. This may result from the fact that it was rarely practiced here as a photographic technique during the 1860s.
Post a Comment